Antiwar Democrat globalist takes on Joe Lieberman for 2006 US Senate nomination from Connecticut.

Connecticut millionaire, pro-world government advocate and antiwar activist Ned Lamont believes he can take out moderate Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman in the Democratic primary. And, even though the early polls gave Lieberman an edge over the Lamont Digital Systems founder, Lamont is raising eyebrows in liberal circles nationwide because over the past six weeks since he announced he was seeking the Democratic nomination for the US Senate, he raised $344 thousand from 4,300 online donors—and added $371,500 of his own money from his cable TV operation to the kitty.

The 52-year old cable TV entrepreneur from an old money financial family is blitzing the State, speaking at as many as three political events each day. His message is as simple as it is anti-Bush and anti-Lieberman. On his website, http://www.nedlamont.com, Lamont says: "I'm running for the US Senate because we deserve a Senator who will stand up for Connecticut and stand up for our progressive democratic values. Rather than spending hundreds of millions a dollar a day in Iraq, it is time for America to refocus on issues back home: fixing our healthcare system, upgrading our schools, and rebuilding our aging infrastructure We will start winning in Iraq as the Iraqis start to take control of their own destiny, just as American has to start investing again in its own future.

"I would have led the opposition to Judge Samuel Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court, which may soon be considering the South Dakota law which outlaws a woman's right to choose even in the case of rape and incest. I will push for energy conservation and efficiency standards as the best means for energy independence and a cleaner environment." Connecticut should take a real close look at Ned Lamont because what they see is not what they will get should they decide to dump Lieberman in the August primary. And, that goes for the antiwar crowd that wants American troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan—and the nonpolitical working class John and Jane Does that become tepidity political every other year during the federal elections.

Lamont's views identify him as a typical rich liberal square peg in a American star-shaped working class entrepreneurial hole. Most Americans don't realize it because they never look close enough to realize the pegs don't fit because even if you can hammer the peg into the hole, the space that remains unfilled is the conscience of the nation that he lacks. Ned Lamont and his family's wealth—and their control over some of the nation's most powerful politicians—was what Harvard economist John Kenneth Galbraith referred to when he warned the American people in the 1950s that America's economic and financial giants were becoming too powerful. Lamont's family is part of what America refers to as "Camelot." These are the ultra-rich aristocrats who rule this nation from invisible roosts at the pinnacle of power at the tip of the pyramid. When Ned Lamont announced two months ago that he was going to try to unseat Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic primary, former Republican Senator Lowell Weicker—now running as an Independent—had already thrown his hat in the Senatorial ring. When Lamont announced, Weicker pulled out of the race, throwing his support behind Lamont. Weicker is a camp follower of the invisible cabal that runs the Connecticut political machine. He follows the liberal parade with a broom and dust pan, hoping the droppings he sweeps up will provide the fodder he needs to resurrect his political life in 2008.

But despite Lamont's imagined lead by the political talking heads—and the fact that his personal war chest contained $4.8 million as of March, 2006—95% of it his own money—Lieberman still enjoys the advantage of the incumbent. Lieberman has a public identity that secretive rich people like Ned Lamont lack. Potential voters in Connecticut—even liberal voters—greet Lamont with mixed emotions. "This is the first time I've heard of him," confesses Kyle Welch, a 27-year old college student who admits she is tired of Lieberman's pro-war views. "I need to do some more research, but I think its time for somebody new." Welch is an emotional voter who would throw her vote away on antiwar Green Party candidate Ralph Ferrucci if Lamont was not in the race.

The antiwar crowd will vote for Lamont in the primaries largely because they are socialists. The question is: how many antiwar voters are there in Connecticut? And even more important, how many pro-world government voters reside in Connecticut? Since, that's what Lamont is, and has been his entire life. His family was part of a group of globalists who, at the end of World War I, attempted to abrogate America's sovereignty and surrender the liberty of the American citizens to the League of Nations. The media will be watching the Connecticut primary for several reasons. First, its rare to find tenured incumbents threatened by someone within the incumbent's own party. And second, it pits an antiwar challenger against a pro-war incumbent. If Lamont wins against Lieberman, it will suggest to the antiwar crowd that they will be able to defeat enough pro-war incumbents to wrest control of Congress from the GOP.

Lamont will be a tough challenger. He has an antiwar pedigree that is blended with even older money. His great-grandfather was Thomas W. Lamont, an eccentric JP Morgan & Company chairman who commuted to work by yacht. He was part of the Wilson Administration and helped utopian Col. Edward Mandall House negotiate the Treaty of Versailles which contained the League of Nations. Where Lieberman is a nationalist patriot, Lamont, who—like most rich socialists—drapes himself in the American flag, is a fourth generation globalist. His grandfather, Corliss Lamont, was a socialist philosopher who died in 1995. He taught Humanism at Columbia University. He was an atheist who believed the United States and the Soviet Union needed to merge if world peace was going to be achieved. Like most of America's powerful socialists, the Lamont family was part of the one-world Wall Street dynasty. Prophetically, the emerging world government in the Hague is the consolidation of Soviet-style communism and the American free enterprise system came from the blueprint fashioned in the mind of people like Corliss Lamont and the liberal globalists who are attempting to erase the world's boundaries in order to create a global shopping center without walls—the Third Way..

When America entered World War I, Tom Lamont became an unofficial adviser to Wilson, trying to convince the president that cooperating with the Soviets would help defeat Germany. The Soviets under Lenin, however, double-crossed JP Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Mellon and the industrialists and merchant prices in the American International Corporation that financed the Bolshevik Revolution in exchange for the right to develop the economy of the Soviet Union. A few months later, Wilson, pressured to do so by Lamont on behalf of Rockefeller, Mellon and JP Morgan sent troops into the new Soviet Union in an ill-fated attempt to topple Lenin's government and seize the Baku oil fields by the Caspian Sea. Those same men kept American and British troops in Russia until 1924, trying to hold the Baku oil fields in what is now the nation of Georgia. The late John Kenneth Galbraith was right—you can't trust Big Money even when its American money.

After the war, both of Corliss Lamont's parents were active in the peace process the and creation of the League of Nations. It was not surprising that, while he was at Harvard during the early 1920s, he also supported the League of Nations. Lamont debated his classmate Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr., on the merits of globalism. The liberals believed that Lodge, a staunch nationalist, was largely responsible for America's isolationism. That perennially pitted conservatives like Lodge against liberals like Lamont who saw the world as large economic smorgasbord.

But unlike the rest of the Lamont family that kept their socialist leanings under wraps, Corliss Lamont was openly controversial. As student vice-chairman of the Harvard Union, he proposed that Socialist Party President Eugene V. Debs, communist labor organizer William Z. Foster, and radical economist Scott Nearing be invited to address the student body. Ned Lamont's grandfather spent his life as a socialist. Today, the apples don't fall far from the tree.

There is little doubt that Lieberman's in the political fight of his life. Even though he was leading Lamont in the polls 45% to 21% in March, the odds are five-to-one that he's going to lose his race to hold his US Senate seat to Ned Lamont during the Democratic primary in Connecticut in August. If Lamont defeats Lieberman in the primary, he will go on against Paul Streitz, who should easily win the Republican nomination against former Derby, Connecticut mayor Alan Schlesinger. The only thing that would help Streitz beat Lamont, whose family is a member of the invisible cabal that controls the federal bureaucracy, would be a serious border incident equal to Mexico's excursion into the United States on March 9, 1916 when the Mexican bandit Francisco "Pancho" Villa led a raiding party of 485 men, known as Villistas, into Columbus, New Mexico killing 18 Americans and wounding 9 others. Pancho Villa's irregulars were part of an attempt to take back the lands north of the Rio Grande ceded to the United States for $15 million in the Treaty of Gaudalope-Hidalgo just as the National Council of La Raza today is determined to take back the American southwest and restore it to Mexico.

It will not bode well for the American people—particularly isolationist Americans—if Ned Lamont wins Joe Lieberman's US Senate seat. America's borders will open even more and the globalist wedge will be driven even deeper into the Congress of the United States of America. Forget the donkey. Forget the elephant. If you are a nationalist who wants to secure our borders and does not want to surrender our sovereignty to the United Nations, you need to send Joe Lieberman a check—today. Don't wait. Because if you wait, you won't do it...and Lamont will win his primary challenge against Joe Lieberman.